Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Forgiveness A Mental Health Perspective Essay - 721 Words

From a mental health perspective, in order to be able to forgive others one must have self-forgiveness. When a person feels like they have been â€Å"forgiven by God predicted a greater tendency to forgive others unconditionally† (Bassett,Carrier,Charleson,Pak,Schwingel et.al, 2016 para. 13). Forgiveness is now being researched and explored in many different fields of study such including mental health, politics, criminal justice and even business classes and forgiveness will continue to be topic of new studies because of the ways that it can affect one’s life. Looking at forgiveness from a psychological standpoint and being able to give forgiveness can at times be difficult on a person’s mental health, yet most if not all of the studies relate back to a biblical worldview. There was a study/research trial that took place and probably is still being done so today, it is called The Stanford Forgiveness Project where they gather people to participate who have unresolved conflicts in their lives and provide a weekly session where they can talk about the conflict and why is seems to be unresolved. They talk about such things as being able not hold in the anger or harbor resentments against others, that one should not have pity parties where they are only thinking about themselves or continually portray themselves as a victim, or that the conflict only affected them, focus on what is ahead as the past is already done and one cannot go back and redo it rather one should accept it,Show MoreRelatedBenefits And Benefits Of Forgiveness1308 Words   |  6 PagesOne the other hand, there are various benefits from forgiveness. An individual who is more opt to forgiving is more likely to have better mental, physical, and emotional health. When an individual grants forgiveness, it is seen to build on the core of empathy which involves positive emotional, behavioral, and cognitive responses (Witvliet et al., 2001). Bringing upon a more positive and healthy mental, physical, and emotional well-being. When an individual forgives another, they release themselvesRead MoreWhen It Comes To Forgiveness, Because There Really Is No1401 Words   |  6 Pagescomes to forgiveness, because there really is no set and stone definition of forgives, there are no specific steps to forgiveness. Forgiveness is not an easy task, and it takes time for an individual to heal (Rotter, 2001). There are many different aspects that play into forgiving a situation. While forgiveness is seen as an attempt to overcome a situation that has caused unhappy feeling and thoughts, change requires a few different thing. There is no specific set of steps to forgiveness, each modelRead MoreOutcomes Of Alternative And Complementary Therapy On Older Adults Receiving Palliative Care1653 Words   |  7 Pagestherapeutic relationships, well-being, and provides older adults with a higher holistic perspective. Nursing practice also benefits from identifying complementary therapies because this medicine is feasible, safe, well tolerated, and provides patients with efficient self-care skills. This research paper explores the effects of integrating CAM on palliative care and patient well-being. Strategies to Promote and Protect Health A medical research database was used to gather three articles that supports theRead MoreDifferent Religions : Yoruba, Hinduism ( Karma ) And Buddhism1711 Words   |  7 Pagesaddress is how to response to diverse faith within our healthcare practices. This essay serves to compare these three different religious philosophies: Yoruba, Hinduism (karma) and Buddhism, to a Christian’s perspective. These religions have wide perspectives but one will key in on health management and what to expect from healthcare point of view while caring for these patients. Yoruba religion is based on nature worshipping and is rooted deeply on respect for the environment. Their divinitiesRead MoreJournal Article Review Essay846 Words   |  4 Pages Self Forgiveness: The Step Child of Forgiveness Catherine Demere’ Bowen Liberty University June 28, 2012 Journal Article Review 2 Self Forgiveness: The Step Child of Forgiveness Summary The general topic of forgiveness has received a magnitude of attention and research on a conceptual level in recent years. Hall and Fincham consistently noted, however, that self-forgiveness had little toRead MoreResearch Methods Used in the Research Process1256 Words   |  6 Pagesproblem statement. The early stages of forgiveness research focused on self, dispositional, relational forgiveness interventions. However, very little is known about forgiveness interventions in relation to older adults. Thus, investigators of this study seek to examine the effects of brief forgiveness intentions in the context of this developmental stage. purpose statement. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the effects of brief forgiveness interventions via group psychoeducationalRead More A Perception and Motivation Study Among Married Adults Essay1629 Words   |  7 PagesResearch Article Critique: Forgiveness: A perception and motivation study among married adults Abstract The article is endeavors to observe the possible correlation between general forgiveness (actually forgiving) and perceptions of forgiveness (a belief in the concept). This is a summary analyzing the credibility of the article. The summary includes a brief overview and critique of the title, abstract, literature review, methodology, a review of results and discussion, andRead More The Effects of Forgiveness on Mental Health Essay2475 Words   |  10 PagesForgiveness has been defined in many ways by psychologists and researchers with no one universal definition. Hill (as cited in Maltby, Day and Mackaskill 2001) state that it is widely agreed that forgiveness involves a willingness to abandon resentment, negative judgement and indifferent behaviour towards the person who has hurt them Although research is recent, from the last 15 years, it has helped develop our understanding of forgiveness . Research has shown that forgiveness gives positive mentalRead MoreDifferences Between Yorub a, Hinduism ( Karma ) And Buddhism1590 Words   |  7 Pagesaddress is how to response to diverse faith within our healthcare practices. This essay serves to compare these three different religious philosophies: Yoruba, Hinduism (karma) and Buddhism, to a Christian’s perspective. These religions have wide perspectives but one will key in on health management and what to expect from healthcare point of view while caring for these patients. Yoruba religion is based on nature worshipping and is rooted deeply on respect for the environment. Their divinitiesRead MorePSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION AND MENTAL HEALTH: SACRAMENT OF PENANCE IN PERSPECTIVE3120 Words   |  13 PagesPSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGION AND MENTAL HEALTH: SACRAMENT OF PENANCE IN PERSPECTIVE BY OKOJIE EHINOMHEN PETER epo4escriva@yahoo.com January, 2014 INTRODUCTION Between psychology and religion, any connection? For one who considers religion as having no manifest behaviour, the answer cannot be in the affirmative. As far as can be chronicled of man’s history, religion has always occupied and influenced human behaviour. Through history, we find scholars who at one point or the other made allusion

Monday, December 23, 2019

French and American Criminal Justice Systems Essay

French and American Criminal Justice Systems There many different criminal justice systems in the world today. Some that consists of many of the same policies and some that are considerably different. In the case of France and the U.S. there are a lot of similarities, but I will be focusing on the differences between each of their systems. The aspects that I will be comparing are police, courts, the legal profession, legal education, criminal procedural law, corrections, and juvenile justice and the advantages and disadvantages of each. The policing system in France is a lot different than the one in the U.S. In France there is one big centralized police system run by the government. Unlike the fragmented police model, which is†¦show more content†¦In France they have the Constitutional council which has nine members serving a nine year term, they are responsible for election complaints and the legislation made in parliament. The advantage of this is that it reduces the conflict of jurisdictions. But the disadvantage is that our Supreme Court has a longer term than the Constitutional Council which allows more constant laws and fewer laws that will contradict each other. The aspect of legal profession and legal education is also extremely different. To become a judge in France you must first obtain a law degree from a university law school. Next you must gain admission to the National School for the Judiciary at Bordeaux (Terrill 236). After completing this school, the candidate is now qualified to become a judge. The French system allows judges to begin their profession at an early age which could be a disadvantage because of lack of experience in the system, where judges in the United States are usually older and more knowledgeable. The legal education is noticeably different from America. In France, students enter a university when they are approximately 18 years old, after they have completed their high school education with an award of the baccalaureate diploma (Terrill 242). In America you must go through undergraduate and graduate law school, and then pass the bar in order to get your law degree. It’s an advantage because students in France start their career aShow MoreRelatedTraditional Assumptions Of The Civil Justice History865 Words   |  4 Pagestraditional assumptions.† American correction page 34. I must say, that period was the most important in the Criminal Justice history. Through that era, revolutions occurred in America as well as France, science made great advances and Industrial Revolution gained absolute power. This Age of Reason was like a stand against those with power. This reformation ended the reign of the Catholic Church and the writing of Martin Luther and John Ca lvin encourage new emphasis on the individual alongRead MoreCriminal Justice System And The Crime System Essay1704 Words   |  7 Pagesthe 5,695 victims of the Bronx criminal court system even though the only evidence that was had was the memory of the alleged victim (Gonnermen 1). As discussed in class, the Criminal Justice System can be looked at as a contract within itself that contains two parts of its social contract, part one as crimes with the punishments to those crimes and part two as the due process to how the legal system handles the suspect of a crime. Even though the Criminal Justice System has been studied and trainingRead MoreCourt Systems in China and the United States994 Words   |  4 PagesCourt Systems in China and the United States In both China and the United States, the judicial system is composed of courts that contain several different levels. However, there is a basic structural difference between the Chinese and American legal systems. In America, the three branches of government are supposed to be separate, so that the court system is supposed to be beyond party politics and partisan antics. This separate system of checks and balances does not exist in China. On the contraryRead MoreThe Criminal Justice System and Courts in America973 Words   |  4 PagesDescribe a court and its purpose. Courts are established social, political, and judicial institutions necessary for the manifestation of justice and the maintenance of law and order. The courts are part of the judicial branch of government, as outlined in Article III of the United States Constitution. Courts are the arenas in which the law is tried and applied. Judges are the presiding officers of the court. The United States Supreme Court is the most fundamental court because has the authorityRead MoreThe Bearing of Race and Ethnicity in the Criminal Justice System1285 Words   |  5 Pagesto whether or not race and ethnicity have a bearing on an individual’s treatment in the criminal justice system for many years. I will be arguing that race and ethnicity do in fact, have a bearing on one’s treatment in the criminal justice system. I will be backing up my position on this topic by providing evidence from five scholarly articles. My first source is African Americans and the Criminal Justice system by Phyllis Gray-Ray, Melvin C. Ray, Sandra Rutland, and Sharon Turner. The authors’ hypothesisRead MoreExpository Essay : The Criminal Justice Department1081 Words   |  5 PagesEnglish 101-I November 18 2015 Expository essay on college major Introduction The Criminal Justice Department provides educational opportunities to help gain skills and knowledge in the areas of criminal delinquent process, criminology, and corrections while evaluating moral and ethical issue of public servants. As a student at Chowan University my career path is law enforcement. I stride to obtain a Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Track, B.S degree, obtaining this degree will prepare me for myRead MoreThe Romanian Criminal Justice System1715 Words   |  7 Pages The Romanian Criminal Justice System Cory J. Mackley-Portley Texas State University – San Marcos The Romanian Criminal Justice System The history and evolution of any country is complex and open to the interpretation of progression or regression as defined by the reader. The history of its criminal justice system is no different. This is more so complicated in that this particular country, Romania, is in a relatively new post-communist era. To increase the understanding of the evolution of lawRead MoreThe Japanese Criminal Justice System1203 Words   |  5 PagesFor some time now, the Japanese criminal justice system has been regarded or perceived to be a successful justice system model. The success is mainly attributed to Japan’s culture and even embedded in the language itself (Goold, 2004). The success has drawn interest among criminology scholars and practitioners either for the purpose of broadening their knowledge or to emulate its criminal justice system (Ebbe, 2000). The interest is based on statistical data that indicate low levels of criminalityRead MoreAbstract. This Memoir Employed A Mixed Me thods Design To1562 Words   |  7 Pagesdesign to evaluate the current system of justice for minors in Haiti. The problem is several juvenile participants became involved in the formal justice system currently set up for adults, with no intervention effectiveness for juveniles. There are remedies that will prove effective. In the latter sections propose interventions in the Juvenile Justice system in Haiti that will reduce the rates of juvenile delinquency when implemented. Examination of juvenile reform systems across the globe includingRead MoreThe Current Japanese Justice System1045 Words   |  5 PagesThe current Japanese justice system encompasses traditional Chinese law and some elements of the American justice system. This is not to say that the systems are similar, far from it. They are quite different due to the perception of the purpose of a justice system based on history and differences in culture. Japan: Pre- World War II â€Å"Modern† Japan is predominantly known as the Meiji Era in 1868. Before this era, Tokugawa governments (between 1503 and 1868) adopted Confucianism and were mostly based

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Bringing Fun to an Organization Free Essays

string(74) " it takes hard work and creativity, mostly from the organization leaders\." The typical workplace is set up to enhance productivity and accomplishments. As such, most employees know the workplace as a place where they go to earn a living to earn a living, while accomplishing the goals set by the employer. Without putting specific effort at bringing fun to the workplace, only a small percentage of workers find some enjoyment or job satisfaction from their jobs. We will write a custom essay sample on Bringing Fun to an Organization or any similar topic only for you Order Now Seeing that this is common across many workplaces and directly affects the job output, employers have nowadays adopted ways of creating fun workplaces as a business strategy (Jeffcoat Gibson 2006). The best way to start-off in bringing fun to the workplace is recruiting employees who have a sense of humor. According to Narisi (2008), the perfect way to gauge whether a job candidate poses a sense of humor is by watching the way he or she responds to interview questions. One of the important questions that the interviewer should answer is, is this person taking him or herself too seriously even in questions that do not require much seriousness? Narisi (2008) suggests the use of ‘dumb’ questions like, ‘why aren’t you married yet? ’, ‘what do you think of the paintings in our office? Among others. Greenwood (2009), states that a survey on 700 American CEOs revealed that 98 percent of them preferred interviewing job candidates with a sense of humor. Most of these CEOs attested to having a passion of not only attracting upbeat candidates, but also admitted to recruiting such and working hard to retain such in their respective organizations. After settling down with the workforce who satisfies the humor criteria, Ryan associates (2004), suggests that employers should introduce other things like dressing for fun on specific days. Despite having the ‘dress for fun’ days in the office, the employer can encourage the staff to wear something frivolous that does not have to be visible, but serves to remind them that they should not take themselves too seriously. According to Urquhart (2003), it is the responsibility of managers to orchestrate fun in the workplace, but he or she should be cognizant of the fact that the employees create fun in the workplace. As such, the managers should act as facilitators to ensure that employees have all the resources and freedom needed to transform the workplace in to a fun place. There is controversy among analysts of just how productive a fun-filled workplace is. To this, Urquhart (2003) argues that a depressed mind is less productive than one that is jovial. In addition, fun creates a positive mental state, where employees learn to love their work and create a bond between employees who share jokes thus creating stronger work teams. Scientists also claim that fun and laughter stimulates the production of oxygen and endorphins to the brain, which results in increased creativity and clear thinking among employees (Urquhart, 2003). In the allbusimess. com (2008) website, employers are encouraged to allow the employees to have flextime in their job schedules. The website states that this shows the employees that the employer is concerned about their welfare. Accordingly, the employee perception motivates them leading to a less stressful and more productive workforce (allbusiness. com, 2008). This perception is backed up by countless other websites, which advocate for the use of fun in the workplace as a sure way of relieving stress, improving the individual health of employees and boosting the overall production of the organization. According to a study conducted by Karl Peluchette (2006), and published in the Journal of Leadership and Organizational studies, employees who worked in fun environments had more confidence in their jobs and were able to serve their clientele better. This argument is backed by Jeffcoat Gibson (2006), who agree that fun in the workplace results in lower downtimes, increased productivity, better job satisfaction and low absenteeism. This gives employers even more reasons to find ways of incorporating fun in the workplace. According to Lynn (2005), bringing fun to the work place is not as easy as many people might wan to believe. This is especially the case where employees and their managers have had conflicting paths regarding flexibility in the workplace. To beat the odds, Lynn (2005) suggests that employers need to create a trusting environment before adopting fun in the workplace. If they fail to create a trusting environment, chances are that the employees will reject any efforts to create fun in the work place. Trust in the workplace can be created through effective communication and respect, which wipes out negative emotions such as fear, hostility and scorn from the employees. According to jobsdb. com (2009), the major responsibility of bringing fun to the workplace lies with the manager. He or she is supposed to schedule breaks, during which employees can engage in fun-filled activities. In addition, he or she can seek employee opinions regarding cultivating fun in the workplace. Such could be by holding contests, celebrations or team-building activities. Another approach of bringing fun to an organization would be the use of morale officer’s who interact with the employees at all times, checking if there are any morale needs that needs to be addressed (Stafford, 2000). The Morale officers’ sole responsibility is to ensure that employees have a reason to look forward to the work environment with renewed anticipation each day. Fun is the one guaranteed way to achieve this. They may seek employee opinions on how best to achieve the organization objectives over lunch or tea. This breaks the office formality and leaves the employees more relaxed. To be successful in making the workplace a fun place, Stafford (2000) suggests that the morale officers should work on five pointers namely, i)feedback from employees, ii) humor, iii)bringing employees together, iv) a reward process for the employees and v) Sticking to the organization’s mission by engaging in creative and innovative work. As noted earlier in this speech, the fun in the workplace is not an easy thing to achieve. According to McGarvey (2006, fun in the workplace does not happen. Rather, it takes hard work and creativity, mostly from the organization leaders. You read "Bringing Fun to an Organization" in category "Papers" To bring fun to the work place hence requires the direct participation of the managerial leaders in the company. As such, it would be futile for the top organization management to issue orders for the employees to have fun, if they do not lead and demonstrate how fun in the company should be modeled. Even employees agree that the best fun trend in the workplace is set from the top management. A perfect example is the CEO and founder of Cognex Corporation, Dr. Robert Shillman, who indulges his employees to creative bonuses, where rather than giving them token money, he looks for fun alternative ways through which they can enjoy their benefits. Shillman is renowned for his work hard and play hard style of management (cognex. com, 2009). To him, the adage â€Å"all work and no play make Jack a dull boy† stands true. The same spirit of leading from the front was exhibited by Wal-mart’s founder, Sam Walton, who not only wore a hula skirt, but also led employees in the giant retailer for a dance along Wall Street (Greenwood, 2009).. Shillman’s management style is celebrated by Joe Neulinger (quoted by Greenwood, 2009), who states that people who do not see the need for fun in the workplace are less likely to become CEOs. This observation is shared by Fry (2001), who states that managers who scores poorly on the fun scale are bad leaders whose lack of ‘a funny bone’ is evident through the unmotivated and less productive teams that they lead. Fry’s suggestion to managers is that they should begin meetings on good cheer, by maybe saying something nice about the workforce, the day or by creating a fun-filled challenge for the group. According to Fry (2001), the possibilities of how much fun the managers can create in the work environment is limitless. However, as indicated elsewhere in the speech, it requires working on. As such, it will require a deliberate effort from the managers to create a fun workplace. Some of them might however dismiss this by saying that people should just do what they were hired to do. For this, the answer is just as blunt; managers, who expect their employee to do nothing else but work while at work, will most likely get less than the expected results. On the other hand, those who induce fun activities in the job environment ends up with an increased bottom line, without having to pressurize employees in to working harder (Fry, 2001). It is thus upon managers to choose, which of the two ways best suits them. Weinstein (1997) suggests that fun can be brought into the work place by doing things differently. For example, instead of generalizing the reward systems such that every employee gets the same reward, a little creativity can infuse fun in the reward program. When such happens, Weinstein, who is also the President PlayFair Inc reckons that the reward scheme becomes more personalized and memorable to each recipient employee. In addition, the employees take pride in not only the reward, but also the means through which the reward was presented to them. The employee can for example take the employees to a shopping mall, hand them money and instruct them to purchase personal gifts in a specified time limit. From such an activity, the employee not only appreciates the reward, but the shopping experience. However, it is not the responsibility of the managers to bring fun to the organization. The individual employees too have a responsibility that they enjoy their jobs, which is the most likely way to achieving job satisfaction amongst them. This however is partly dependent on whether the environment at work place allows them to indulge in fun activities. Hemsath (1997) reckons that in the environment where employees are required to be optimally productive despite the stressful environment that the conventional workplace is, it is incumbent that employees find fun in the workplace without necessarily waiting for the employers hell-bent at changing nothing about the old workplace to affect the fun-changes for them. The best strategy for employees as stated by Hemsath (1997) starts with one self. Here the employee sets to become the fun-catalyst in the office and enliven the spontaneous spirit between him and his co-workers. This can be as effortless as changing one’s title, to take up a more funny title. Secondly, an individual employee can set it upon himself to inspire fun in his colleagues. This is done through encouraging them to take-up fun activities, recognizing and supporting their efforts at creating amusement. If the work environment allows, individual workers can carry toys, play funny music and even post colorful pictures that boost their spirits when at work. The employees can also influence the management to create rooms where the environment is less tense. Another way that individual employees can contribute to fun in an organization is by looking for humor in their situations (Hemsath, 1997). Every situation has its dark and lighter sides. An optimistic employee will concentrate more on the brighter sides of everything, which is more fun than the gloomy downside. To make the workplace comfortable for everyone however, the management and the employees must distinguish between beneficial fun, and jokes that may be deemed offensive by some parties. As such, Vikesland (2007), suggests that the workplace should have some fun rules that distinguish between what is acceptable and outright breach of company policies. As such, the employees should be made to understand that fun is not mocking, mimicking or teasing other co-workers or management. Off-color jokes, sexual innuendos, deception, sarcasm, dark humor and ethnic jokes do not qualify as fun in the workplace too. Conclusion The modern day manager realizes the benefits of bringing fun in an organization. With the countless resources propagating the benefits of bringing fun aboard the organization, well meaning CEOs, Managers or Corporate Strategists will no doubt try incorporating fun into their management styles. While there are countless ways to have fun in the workplace, the general guess however remains that some employees may be too distracted by the fun and hence loose out on the productivity. However, the success stories of same management styles that have adopted fun in the workplace indicates that there are variable ways of ensuring that despite the fun, employees not only meet their targets, but also exceed them. Companies like Google have demonstrated that fun and productivity can go hand-in-hand (Bryant, 2007). What Google offers – play station games, free food, scooters and pets among other things- are just an example of what organizations can give or allow their employees to indulge in. A peak of what life in the Google offices is like can be viewed at http://www. cnn. com/video/#/video/business/2007/01/05/fortune. best. cos. to. work. for. cnn. cnn According to Bathurst (2008), fun in the work place has more than simple benefits. Besides improving productivity, organizations are using it today to battle employee turnover. This is because employees who enjoy the work environment are more likely to stick in the same job for longer than disgruntled employees are. Besides, employees today have more choices and can easily change jobs than was the case in the 1950’s. In conclusion, fun in the workplace has become the new business management trend that people believe encourages employee creativity, morale, satisfaction, productivity and increases employee retention. As such, fun has undeniably become an integral part of the modern corporate culture. References Allbusiness. com. (2008). Making the Workplace Fun. AllBusiness: A D B company. Retrieved 06 May 2009 from http://www. allbusiness. com/human-resources/employee-development-team-building/11357-1. html Barthurst, Patricia. (2008). Having fun at work increases Loyalty, Productivity. AZcentral. com. Retrieved from http://www. azcentral. com/business/articles/2008/06/01/20080601biz-funatwork0601-ON. html Bryant, Steve. (2007). Perks du Soleil: Fun-Loving Google named Best place to Work. Retrieved from http://googlewatch. eweek. com/content/inside_google/perks_du_soleil_google_named_best_place_to_work. html Cognex. com. (2009). Cognex Corporation: Senior Management. Retrieved from http://www. cognex. com/CognexInfo/Leadership/default. aspx? id=210 Fry, Ann. (2001). Just Having Fun at work can boost productivity. Austin Business Journal. Retrieved http://austin. bizjournals. com/austin/stories/2001/06/04/smallb4. html Greenwood, Ramon. Are you Having Fun at Work? Career Know-how. Retrieved from http://www. careerknowhow. com/guidance/fun. htm Hemsath, Dave. (1997). Are we having Fun Yet? Journal of Quality and participation. Retrieved from http://findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_qa3616/is_199711/ai_n8773216/pg_2/? tag=content;col1 Jeffcoat Gibson. (2006). Fun as Serious as Business: Creating a Fun Work Environment As an Effective Business Strategy. Journal of Business and Economic Research. Vol. 4. No. 2. Retrieved from http://www. cluteinstitute-onlinejournals. com/PDFs/2006321. pdf jobsdb. com. (2009). Making the Workplace Fun. JobsDB. com. Retrieved from http://th. jobsdb. com/TH/EN/V6HTML/Home/humanresource_editor26. htm Karl Peluchette. (2006). How does Workplace Fun Impact employee Perceptions of Customer service Quality. Abst. Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies. Vol. 13. No. 2. Retrieved from http://jlo. sagepub. com/cgi/content/abstract/13/2/2 Lynn, Harland. (2005). Attitudes toward Workplace fun: A Three-Sector Comparison. Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies. Retrieved http://www. allbusiness. com/buying_exiting_businesses/3503649-1. html Narisi, Sam. (2008). HR’s Funny side: What Kind of Fruit would you be? HR Recruiting Alert. com. Retrieved 06 May 2009 from http://www. hrrecruitingalert. com/hrs-funny-side-what-kind-of-nut-would-you-be/ McGarvey, Robert. (1996). Comic Relief- Having fun at Work. Entrepreneur Journal. Retrieved from http://findarticles. com/p/articles/mi_m0DTI/is_n10_v24/ai_18726422/pg_2/? tag=content;col1 Ryan, Kevin. (2004). Humor in Business: 16 ways How to cite Bringing Fun to an Organization, Papers

Friday, December 6, 2019

Liability Facing Auditors due to Global Financial Crisis

Question: Describe about the Liability Facing Auditors due to Global Financial Crisis. Answer: Executive Summary The contemporary worldwide financial crises have escalated lasting debate relating to professional accounting as well as financial press regarding the reasonable nature of the liability of the auditor as well as the possible risk which fruitful lawsuits against auditors of a failed financial services organization and banks might serve to reduce a known audit companies (Anderson 2008, p. 56). The principle of privity of contract has been dominance in the legal arena. Under such a policy, auditors appeared vulnerable as they were liable to contractual entities like the user Corporation or main beneficiary outlined in the agreement of the audit. The literature on auditor liability has previously emphasized individual issues isolation. The paper has integrated the key issues while considering, cost as well as implication of the audit liability regime. It has also overviewed the contemporary calculus utilized in the assessment of damages as well as reform suggestion to limit liability. The results show that the current audit liability regime applicable to auditors is severe as it inequitably imposes enormous costs on auditors (Baker and Prentice 2008, p.34). It can be argued rightly that a better intervention would seem to be the introduction of a professional liability regime coupled with a mandatory need which directors hold professional liability insurance alongside reformation of the calculus utilized in the assessment of damages. Introduction The array of operators to whom inspectors owed duties of care extended progressively and consequently hit the degree where liabilities claim might be affected by practically any participant sensibly regarded to depend on opinion of audit (Quick 2013). The scope extension emerged as an appropriate mechanism to encourage the professional conduct of auditors as well as a reaction to the rising civic requests to reasonable innocent third party service. Liability of auditors during the financial crisis is a critical issue that face auditors as they audit the financial statements of corporations. Like any other expert advisers, auditors frequently be indebted duties of care to their auditing clients (Rajacic, Rajapakse and Webb 2000, p. 48). The liability entails a responsibility in law that requires auditors to undertake their works with the skills as well as competence which society as well as end-users need to be entitled to anticipate. In the case of the existence of this duty of care, and an auditor fails to undertake the auditing work out of the standard required, the end-users have the right to sue such an auditor for compensation for the loss caused by an auditors negligence. Understanding Auditors Liabilities Liability of audit is tied to the manner it needs, adjustments and corrections for making financial statements. The auditors must make corresponding changes to the financial declarations of the opinion of auditors to cancel the reservations. It, therefore, trails that an existence of direct link to liability as well as obedience with reporting of the accounts regardless of whether it is a sole managements responsibility of the inspected company (Kachelmeier, Schmidt and Valentine 2015, p.59). The management responsibility of the auditees is critical than that of auditor responsible for the grounding of financial statements for adherence to the financial reportage structure accounting for the manner he planned as well as operative internal control system, the statement of line which provides the assessor. Accordingly, it remains essential to pronouncement of conformism as it settles that managing supply the auditor with the required material. During the volatile market crises period particularly the market of real estate succeeding the fair value estimates is regularly fairly hard and more problematic hence the examiner lacks indexes on the estimates dependability made by the company (Hodge, Martin and Pratt 2005, p.63). Auditors reports need always to consist of a section on parts of accountability of the auditor alongside management, explicated the kind of audit as well as statements affirming the reasonability of the opinion to assurance rather than outright assurance that the financial statements remain safe of any substantial misstatement. Rationale for Audit Liability Exposing auditors to such a liability is always viewed a good thing as it concentrates the advisers minds thereby driving quality and customer care. The auditors might cause severe dangers to corporations where they are not motivated by the prospect of the retribution for the substandard work. This is because it will give most advisers a gap thereby failing to exercise the right level of care and skills. No one is, therefore, advocating for freeing auditors for this reason from liability for the mistake auditor commit and which lead to poor quality audited reports (Pitts and Wale 2008, p.40). Responsibilities of Auditors that trigger Liability The responsibility is hence leadership and pronounces all associated parties as well as transactions between the parties. The auditors needs to take this declaration seriously in his work. Surprisingly, the auditor cannot verify very the accuracy of these operations and hence constrained when reporting in different audit report paragraphs (Gaver, Paterson and Pacini 2012, p.53). The auditor is responsible for the formulation of an opinion on the financial statement affirming their correct and fair reflection in all factual facets as well as dealings of trading period to which it denotes (Free 2009, p. 54). The auditor, in some conditions, may not express any opinion, particularly when the missions scope is restricted or where the auditor lacks the capacity to consider all the needed standards to provide a view. The auditor also has a responsibility for making sure that there is quality control of work as well as audit work by having an effective teamwork. The rationale of cooperation as a display of quality control is that working in teams; one will be able to check works done by another giving collaboration a kind of quality control auditing of the expert services. The quality control is a critical aspect in auditing since individual audit firm or Cabinet has to make sure that whatever is undertaken is done effectively. Controlling quality is primarily prearranged since they exist adequately comprehensive printed processes that are appropriate as well as reliable to decrease or even get rid of the risk of error during the audit mission. The financial review ensures quality by completing as well as signing all the sections relevant to the program of the audit (Davies 2011, p.171). It is also achieved by financial audit signing as well as dating all the working document of the entity who has made as well through the analysis as well as synthesis to prove individual element of balance as well as by analyzing all the significant amount of loss or profits. The financial auditor has a responsibility evaluating as well as using the control system and they are required to account for its position in the audit work. In case the internal control system is inexistence or improperly established, the auditor might fail to recognize much risk of error and fraud which are the two critical misleading information in auditing work (Burton, Wilks and Zimbelman 2013, p.65).). It is typical that the target users of any financial statement do recognize error and fraud, however, it is the responsibility of the auditor to consider fraud in an audit of the financial statements. The financial auditor will, however, not held responsible for the prevention of error and fraud, but bears the sole responsibility for planning as well as performing the audit thereby obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements are meaningfully accurate on both fault and fraud (Brown, Majors and Peecher 2014, p. 40). It is, however, a challenging task if the auditor is required to uncover all the fraud and errors to establish threshold of errors. This is, indeed the relative significance of the financial auditor which find their view articulated. Vulnerabilities of Auditors Joint and various Liability Debates exist pointing out that in some cases, rules regarding liability of auditors can be unreasonable and culminate into undesirable consequences. The reference here is based on joint and various liability which exist in the United Kingdom and several common law-oriented jurisdictions globally. Under such a system, an individual who has been owed a duty of care, and who subsequently claims to have a damage, enjoys a right to take a legal action against any or all auditors alleged to have triggered the loss (Pitts and Wale 2008, p.47). The critical matter is that in case an individual party is regarded to be able, and thus more probably to be in a situation essentially to compensate the compensations demanded, the plaintiff has an option of choosing to sue just that party while the rest let off effectively. The deep pocket Syndrome The deep-pocket syndrome further makes the auditors the most vulnerable group since they have professional indemnity insurance hence perceived as the best targets. The situation is likely to collapse in two undesirable outcomes (Persellin 2013, p.65). In case auditors are so confined by the threats of being sued, the auditors will choose to remain reluctant to participate in any innovative work which might actually generate real benefits to stakeholders. Auditors as Admission Tickets Auditors have, therefore, been admission tickets for both creditors and investors. Many have contended that creditors and stockholders tend to view collapse or failures of businesses as failures of auditors. They, therefore, frequently look to the auditors whenever they search for a flush party from whom losses can be compensated. Even though auditors may be comforted by the latest decisions linked to liability to third parties, the potential liability scope to entities as well as liquidators remain vast (Asay 2014, p. 43). This is because when an auditor accepts a contract to advise the client who employs her, she owes a duty to exercise that standard of skills as well as care relevant to such a professional status. Accordingly, the auditor will be liable both in tort and contract for all the losses suffered by the Client because of any breach of such a duty. Limited Expression of Opinion The auditor needs to be careful when expressing his opinion since in case of an adverse auditors opinion unfairly and incorrectly confirming the correct reflecting of reality, the responsibility of the auditor will derive from his perception. The liability of the auditor in this case will increase as a result of the potential occurrence of event following the date of the balance sheet (Elliott, Rennekamp and White 2015, p. 65). The management of the audited entity will regard the materiality of the facts before making a decision on whether it is essential to modify the financial statements. Here, it remains hard for the auditor to control whether following such alterations, the items value included in the financial statements are properly created. Auditors as Subjects to various heads of potential liability Auditors are also subject to various heads of potential liability as they discharge their statutory roles. This responsibility stretches to liabilities as reflected in subsection fifty-two and seventy-four of the Trade Practices Act of 1974 alongside many state Fair Trading Acts (Auditor's Legal Liability to Third Parties. 2013, p.145). Weakness in Auditing Standards Auditing standards, however, makes no difference as to the statutory auditors liability in the detection of errors from the financial burden of the auditors in discovering fraud (Beever 2012; Zisa 2013, p.45). Financial auditor is needed to acquire as well as deliver reasonable assurance that the financial statements lacks erroneous information for both fraud and error. It is, however, a common knowledge that it is challenging to acknowledge fraud than detection of the unintentional errors being concealed by the managers and employees who have committed a fraud. Nevertheless, the responsibility of the auditor for successful financial audit management remains unchanged even in the face of this difficulty. Threats of Litigation The auditing profession has been criticized and accused quite often over the years of being too conservative and of couching reports in defensive and legalistic basis to escape litigation. The resulting problem is that auditors are currently needed to expand the scope of their work, but this is restricted unless the threat of litigation is eliminated to avoid auditors destruction (Pl, 2010, p.30). Threats of litigation has various undesirable consequences to both auditors and their clients: Impairment of company risk management The restriction thus means that regulatory bodies and stakeholders functions such as provision of assurance by auditors on new areas such as companys risk management effectiveness is impaired as no auditors will be willing to take up such expanded tasks. Disincentive to smaller companies to acquire services of an audit of large corporations The other unfortunate consequences of auditors reluctance which is linked directly to matters of completions are the possible disincentive to smaller companies to acquire services of an audit of large corporations due to the threat of being sued (Messier, Quick and Vandervelde 2014, p.59). A small firm might be compelled to refrain from seeking the assistance of a large audit firm even if it regards to have the competence, resources, skills and experience to tender an engagement if the financial risk linked to audit failure would be adequate to collapse the company. Recommendations Auditors and firms should embrace a school of thought that emerged after Anderson collapse. The failure followed the Enron scandal ruining its name that reputational risk is equivalent financial risk as an inducement to provide the finest guidance. Academics and practitioners alike should lobby for separation of responsibilities between management and auditors regarding identification of fraud and errors to reduce liabilities since audit responsibility has been a matter of escalating concern. Audit firms and institutes in Australia, Europe as well as North America should lobby for alterations in the law emphasized on the concept of joint as well as several liabilities. This will address the significant claims alongside skyrocketed cost of indemnity insurance cover. There is a need for refocus on matters pertaining corporate governance as well as general viewpoints requiring directors to embrace a proactive undertaking in the corporate management thereby elevating the issues circumventing the limitation of auditors liability. The theoretical problem of an auditor liability must be one which designs an optimal measure to provide incentive to an auditor rather than shirking without culminating to extreme burden. References Anderson, A.P., 2008. Accountants' Liability to Third Parties for an Audit. Marquette Law Review, 52(1), p.158. Asay, H.S., 2014. Horizon-induced optimism as a gateway to earnings management. Available at SSRN 2274180. Auditor's Legal Liability to Third Parties, The. W. Res. L. Rev., 7, p.145. Backof, A.G., Bamber, E.M. and Carpenter, T.D., 2016. Do auditor judgment frameworks help in constraining aggressive reporting? Evidence under more precise and less precise accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, pp.1-11. Baker, C.R. and Prentice, D., 2008. The origins of auditor liability to third parties under United States common law. Accounting History, 13(2), pp.163-182. Beever, J.R., 2012 Zisa, J.W., 2013. Guarding the Guardians: Expanding Auditor Negligence Liability to Third-Party Users of Financial Information. Campbell L. Rev., 11, p.123. Brown, T., Majors, T.M. and Peecher, M.E., 2014. The impact of a judgment rule and critical audit matters on assessments of auditor legal liabilitythe moderating role of legal knowledge. Available at SSRN 2483221. Burton, F. G., Wilks, T. J., Zimbelman, M. F. (2013). How Auditor Legal Liability Influences the Detection and Frequency of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Current Issues in Auditing, 7(2), P9-P15. Davies, M., 1991. Liability of Auditors to Third Parties in Negligence, The. UNSWLJ, 14, p.171. Elliott, W.B., Rennekamp, K.M. and White, B.J., 2015. Does concrete language in disclosures increase willingness to invest?. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(2), pp.839-865. Free, C., 1999. Limiting auditors' liability. Bond L. Rev., 11, p.i. Gaver, J.J., Paterson, J.S. and Pacini, C.J., 2012. The influence of auditor state-level legal liability on conservative financial reporting in the property-casualty insurance industry. Auditing: A Journal of Practice Theory, 31(3), pp.95-124. Hodge, F.D., Martin, R.D. and Pratt, J.H., 2005. Audit qualifications of income-decreasing accounting choices. Available at SSRN 574222. Kachelmeier, S.J., Schmidt, J.J. and Valentine, K., 2015. The disclaimer effect of disclosing critical audit matters in the auditors report. Available at SSRN 2481284. Messier, W.F., Quick, L.A. and Vandervelde, S.D., 2014. The influence of process accountability and accounting standard type on auditor usage of a status quo heuristic. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(1), pp.59-74. Pl, T. (2010). The impact of the economic crisis on auditing. European Integration Studies, 8(1), 131-142. Persellin, J.S., 2013. The influence of PCAOB inspections on audit committee members' judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(2), pp.97-114. Pitts, M. and Wale, J., 2008. Comparisons are odorous(Shakespeare): financial performance and management competence at four Scottish colliery companies, 190046. Accounting History, 13(4), pp.511-543. Quick, L., 2013. When less is more: The effect of reducing auditor liability on auditor judgments in principles-based and rules-based environments. Rajacic, M., Rajapakse, P., Webb, E. (2000). Impact of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) on the Liability of Auditors, The. U. Tas. L. Rev., 19, 205. Rajapakse, P. J. (2015). A review of financial reporting liability lawsuits in Singapore. Jindal Global Law Review, 6(2), 207-230. Rose, J.M., Rose, A.M., Norman, C.S. and Mazza, C.R., 2014. Will disclosure of friendship ties between directors and CEOs yield perverse effects?. The Accounting Review, 89(4), pp.1545-1563. Samsonova, A., Humphrey, C., Kokkali, S. (2010). Re-thinking auditor liability: The case of the European Unions regulatory reform. In Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary research in Accounting (APIRA) conference, Sydney, Australia. Todea, N., Stanciu, I. C. (2009). Auditor liability in period of financial crisis. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 11(1), 218.